New traders occasionally make critical errors when creating a commodity trading system that will actually make money. Most of them will do a little research and then back test the system over a period of time to see if the system made money in the past.
However, this is a routine mistake made by rookies. In this article, I will talk about the reason why this method of commodity trading system development usually fails and why.
Creating a computerized trading system appears to be an exciting undertaking for some. They study a method by reading books, blogs and magazines. Some may even attend seminars to obtain the missing piece of the system which will help them find the Holy Grail.
Once they put together a system, the next logical step would be to back test the system over a period of time to see how profitable that it would have been. This period of time is usually arbitrary but a period of time that appears to be significant to the trader developing the system. Looking For Bangkok System Development visit http://www.piatec.co.th/ (which is also known as “ バンコクシステム開発訪問 http://www.piatec.co.th/ ” in the Japanese language)
Once the results of the system are tested and the input variables for the indicators optimized for the most accurate trades potential with the highest rate of return, the trader usually starts fretting about the fantastic future that lies ahead. Unfortunately, there’s a really major issue with this scenario. Rather than this , get more info about Scratch development through http://www.piatec.co.th/ (which is also known as ” スクラッチ開発 http://www.piatec.co.th/” in the Japanese language )
To begin with, this procedure is based on the presupposition that the future will be like the past. Well, this is almost never true. Even if similar economic elements exist in the future as in the past, it is highly unlikely that the participants will be the same as they were ten years ago when the system was back analyzed.
So as to be a Systems Development Manager, you have to be a lot of things: front man, teacher, mentor, sage, politician, etc.. For you to survive in the modern corporate world you need to say one thing to your superiors and staff, but then do something entirely different in practice.